Consumers would give IDS green light to overhaul winter fuel payments

Consumers would give Iain Duncan Smith a green light to overhaul the winter fuel allowance, according to research from uSwitch.com, the independent price comparison and switching service.

Over eight in ten (82%) would like to see winter fuel payments restricted to those living in the UK, while the high profile campaign by wealthier, celebrity ‘pensioners', such as Joanna Lumley and Esther Rantzen, has also touched a nerve. Two thirds of consumers (66%) think that people should be allowed to opt-out of winter fuel payments if they can afford their energy bills without them. At the moment, those who don't need the cash cannot give it back.
 
Currently the allowance goes to anyone born on or before 5th July, 1951. However, almost half of consumers (49%) want winter fuel payments to be means tested, while almost six in ten think health should be taken into account as well as age (58%). With households battling with the rising cost of living, over half (55%) also think that payments should automatically increase in line with inflation.
 
Ann Robinson, Director of Consumer Policy at uSwitch.com, says: "With household energy bills at a record-high, winter fuel payments can be a life-line for state pensioners struggling to get by. Our research shows overwhelming support for the allowance to continue, but a growing recognition that payments could be better targeted at those who actually need the extra help.
 
"Almost seven in ten households (69%) went without heating at some point over the winter to keep their energy costs down, while over a third of people (35%) say that cutting back on energy usage is affecting their quality of life or health - up from 15% last year. Limiting winter fuel payments to those living in the UK and giving wealthier recipients the right to opt-out could prove popular moves and would put more money in the kitty for those in greater hardship."