RSS Feed

Related Articles

Related Categories

Investors call for improvements in Japanese corporate governance

14th May 2008 Print
Despite significant improvements among a number of leading Japanese companies, the system of governance in most listed companies in Japan is failing to meet the needs of shareholders, according to a White Paper on corporate governance practices in Japan published by the Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA).

The "Japan White Paper", the first collaborative policy document of its kind, has been compiled with the support an input of a group of leading pension funds and asset managers, including F&C, with combined assets under management of around US$5 trillion, accounting for a significant proportion of foreign shareholdings in Japan.

Japan's current model of corporate governance emerged from a corporate model that has its roots in the 1950s and 1960s, a period of rapid reconstruction and growth. At the time the country had a much younger population, companies didn't have the dominant position they have today and investment capital was scarce. This model was often driven intense, oligopolistic competition and pursuit of internal generation of capital. This system worked at the time but is less appropriate today, as companies are not starved of capital and a more open corporate capitalism model is needed.

The White Paper found governance practices in Japan often don't meet the needs of stakeholders, or the nation at large, in three ways:

By not providing for adequate supervision of corporate strategy;

By protecting management from the discipline of the market, thus rendering the development of a healthy and efficient market in corporate control all but impossible;

By failing to provide the returns that are vitally necessary to protect Japan's social safety net-its pension system.

Accordingly, the White Paper makes recommendations with regard to six key issues:

1. Recognition of shareholders as owners of listed companies
2. Efficient use of capital
3. Independent supervision of management
4. Pre-emption rights and third-party share placements
5. Poison pill takeover defences
6. Fairness and transparency in shareholder voting

"We believe these are the most pressing issues which relate to corporate governance in Japan today because they have an impact on the companies we invest in. It is still common for listed companies in Japan to be run as if management, and not shareholders, were the owners and changes are needed," said Anna Krutikov, Associate Director, Governance & Sustainable Investment at F&C. "Using its influence a leading shareholder, F&C has been encouraging more sustainable corporate behaviour among Japanese companies for years. We are very pleased to have contributed to this initiative led by the ACGA and backed by leading institutional investors across the world. "

Along with F&C, the "Japan White Paper" has been endorsed by Aberdeen Asset Management, Singapore; British Columbia Investment Management Corporation, Canada; the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), US; Hermes Fund Managers, UK; RAILPEN Investments, UK; and the Universities Superannuation Scheme, UK.